fbpx Finally, Pluto's new moons have their names | Page 21 | Science in the net

Finally, Pluto's new moons have their names

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

Styx and Kerberos: these are the names the International Astronomical Union (IAU) gave to the two Pluto's moons, discovered between 2011 and 2012, and provisionally called P4 and P5. The final choice has been made after a selection carried out by the international organization on the results of a survey promoted by SETI, to whom everybody could participate.

Such an idea was suggested by Mark Showalter, leader of the team that discovered the two moons with the Hubble Space Telescope (thanks to a NASA-ESA collaboration), and narrowed the range of possible names to those coming from classic Greek-Roman mythology, with a particular focus to Hades names, to be coherent with the other three moons. Volcano and Kerberos got the highest numbers (174,000 out of more than 450,000 for the former, 99,500 for the latter), followed by Styx, Persephone and Orpheus.

However, being on top of this list did not help Volcano - in spite of an excellent backer like the actor William Shatner, from the science-fiction tv shows Star Trek, who supported this name as the one that gave birth to Captain Spock. In fact, the IAU could not validate it, since it has been already used for an hypothetical planet, whose existence within the Solar System was theorized by Urban Le Verrier in 1859.

Following the discovery of a new celestial body, it is up to the IAU to coordinate each step of the attribution of a name, in collaboration with the Committee on Small Body Nomenclature and the Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature, together with the free and open participation of astronomers and, sometimes, even of the pubblic. Always abiding by a standard procedure.

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Astronomy

prossimo articolo

Europe votes on the new air quality directive

The European Parliament's vote (and subsequently the Council of Europe's) on the new European Directive on air quality is expected for September 13. This directive updates the allowed atmospheric pollutant limits, bringing them closer to those established by the WHO in 2021. Resistance to the new objectives, mainly coming from the industrial world and established economic interests in certain regions, makes the outcome of the vote uncertain. However, there are no serious scientific or political reasons to oppose or attempt to dilute the more ambitious limits proposed by the new directive.

Image credits: JC Gellidon/Unsplash

The new European Directive on air quality, currently under discussion in the European Parliament, updates the concentration limits of major air pollutants, bringing them closer to those set by the new guidelines of the World Health Organization (2021). The outcome of the vote, scheduled for September 13, is uncertain.