fbpx DIY Nano, all about nanoscale science | Science in the net

DIY Nano, all about nanoscale science

Primary tabs

Read time: 1 min

The DIY Nano app allows families to experience and learn about nanoscale science, engineering, and technology at home or on the go. The app was released thanks to a collaboration between Lawrence Hall of Science, Sciencenter, Emily Maletz Graphic Design and the Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network (NISE Network).
The DIY Nano app was supported by the National Science Foundation.

The app provides free, easy to use, hands-on activities at your fingertips. Each activity includes material lists, step-by-step instructions, and detailed explanations. The activity materials are widely available and inexpensive. The app includes links to family friendly videos.

[video:http://vimeo.com/32870203]

[video:http://vimeo.com/42373588]

The Lawrence Hall of Science is the UC Berkeley's public science center. The Lawrence Hall of Science have been providing parents, kids, and educators with opportunities to engage with science since 1968.

[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJ1wUytZlX4]

It is possibile to find The Lawrence Hall of Science on YouTube, Twitter, Facebook and Flickr.

Previews of the app:

DIY Nano DIY Nano DIY Nano DIY Nano


Scienza in rete è un giornale senza pubblicità e aperto a tutti per garantire l’indipendenza dell’informazione e il diritto universale alla cittadinanza scientifica. Contribuisci a dar voce alla ricerca sostenendo Scienza in rete. In questo modo, potrai entrare a far parte della nostra comunità e condividere il nostro percorso. Clicca sul pulsante e scegli liberamente quanto donare! Anche una piccola somma è importante. Se vuoi fare una donazione ricorrente, ci consenti di programmare meglio il nostro lavoro e resti comunque libero di interromperla quando credi.


prossimo articolo

Why Camillo Ricordi is not credible

I met Camillo Ricordi just once. In my life as in my job, I have no enemies to strike or friends to justify. However, public behaviour and coherence inside and outside our profession are essential, if we want to be credible. Ricordi, in my opinion, is not. His public behaviour “not in favour or against” a State fraud that is damaging the patients is not excusable (especially, I would say) if you have a “big name”.

His attempt to get credits by “discrediting Italian science and medicine”, as we could not fully comprehend what Stamina is doing, is not excusable.