fbpx Why we have a problem with vaccination coverage | Science in the net

Why we have a problem with vaccination coverage

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

From the TELLME website

With the winter at the door, influenza epidemics are a problem to deal with. Every year they cause significant morbidity and mortality throughout Europe, especially in high-risk groups such as older people, individuals with chronic diseases, pregnant women and small children. In most of EU/EEA countries, uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination for these more endangered groups fall below the coverage threshold that the European Council of Ministers set at 75%.

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control  (ECDC) has conducted a systematic review to identify those elements that are responsible for such situation and the results of this study have just been released.

In elderly people, personalized postcards or phone calls seems to be effective, whilst misperceptions about the vaccine might be a barrier to receiving vaccination, thus highlighting the importance of an effective communication, necessary to debunk falsities and misrepresentations of vaccines. Other barriers to vaccination include social disadvantage, smoking, and lack of social support.

As for healthcare workers, education or promotion proved to be an effective approach in non-hospital settings but never raised vaccination rates above 90% within hospitals, in spite of being the most common interventions. Two observational studies from the USA also suggest that mandatory vaccine policies are more successful in improving rates of vaccination above 95%.

No good quality evidence on interventions was found for pregnant women, as well as for children.

At a general level, electronic reminders might help improving flu vaccination rates in adults if they can access the internet and use it regularly. Also, countries with high per capita income have significantly higher rates of coverage in adults and having to pay for vaccines is also a barrier, especially in the poorer countries.


Scienza in rete è un giornale senza pubblicità e aperto a tutti per garantire l’indipendenza dell’informazione e il diritto universale alla cittadinanza scientifica. Contribuisci a dar voce alla ricerca sostenendo Scienza in rete. In questo modo, potrai entrare a far parte della nostra comunità e condividere il nostro percorso. Clicca sul pulsante e scegli liberamente quanto donare! Anche una piccola somma è importante. Se vuoi fare una donazione ricorrente, ci consenti di programmare meglio il nostro lavoro e resti comunque libero di interromperla quando credi.


prossimo articolo

President Trump reshapes US research landscape

trump

Con una serie di ordini esecutivi, Donald Trump smantella le politiche climatiche di Biden e ritira gli Stati Uniti dall'accordo di Parigi. Le agenzie federali scientifiche (EPA, NIH, CDC, FDA, NASA) vengono ristrutturate con nuove nomine orientate alla deregolamentazione. Vengono congelate le assunzioni federali, mentre la revisione delle collaborazioni internazionali potrebbe ridefinire il ruolo USA nella ricerca globale. Immagine: Donald Trump.

20 January 2025 marks a turning point in US science policy, with a series of executive orders drastically redefining the role of federal science and research agencies. A detailed analysis of the documents reveals an approach that fundamentally changes the basis of US climate, energy and biomedical research policy.

This comprehensive list shows the scope and breadth of the first day's interventions, which touch virtually every aspect of the federal government, from foreign policy to national security, from energy to immigration, from administrative reform to social policy.