fbpx Change in attitudes towards vaccination after H1N1 pandemic | Science in the net

Change in attitudes towards vaccination after H1N1 pandemic

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

From TELLME website

As recognized by many experts, the ongoing decline of public confidence in vaccines is one of the main challenges for public health management. A recent paper published on Eurosurveillance shows that unfavorable attitudes towards vaccination dramatically increased from 8.5% in 2000 to 38.2% in 2010 in France.

The study investigated the potential impact of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic on attitudes towards vaccination among people living in metropolitan France. It was based on data from the last three waves (2000, 2005, 2010) of the “Health Barometer”, a telephone survey on health perceptions, knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, which was targeted at the general population. The age interval of the sample was 12 to 75 years (15 to 85 years in 2010).

It is interesting to note that beyond the increase in negative attitudes observed in 2009 to 2010, half of the respondents who endorsed these attitudes spontaneously mentioned their opposition to the influenza A(H1N1) vaccine. Such a shift demonstrates that many people who accept vaccines may change their mind and that this episode may have undermined public confidence in health authorities and vaccination.

Another interesting result is that sociodemographic profile associated with unfavorable attitudes towards vaccination in general significantly changed in 2009/10: influenza A(H1N1) vaccination acceptance was correlated with high educational level, high socioeconomic status and living in a household with a child under the age of five years. This result is in contrast with some previous studies, which found that highly educated parents were prone to refuse vaccination for their children, even if these parents did not oppose vaccination in general. Such disparities may be due to the fact that people with lower education are much less likely to use information material from official authorities, as some studies demonstrated.

Articoli correlati

Scienza in rete è un giornale senza pubblicità e aperto a tutti per garantire l’indipendenza dell’informazione e il diritto universale alla cittadinanza scientifica. Contribuisci a dar voce alla ricerca sostenendo Scienza in rete. In questo modo, potrai entrare a far parte della nostra comunità e condividere il nostro percorso. Clicca sul pulsante e scegli liberamente quanto donare! Anche una piccola somma è importante. Se vuoi fare una donazione ricorrente, ci consenti di programmare meglio il nostro lavoro e resti comunque libero di interromperla quando credi.


prossimo articolo

The Log and the Speck: The True Causes of Wildfires and Floods

The Parable of the Speck and the Log. Ottmar Ellinger the Younger

The wildfires in Los Angeles and other extreme events, as well as their media coverage, highlight how immediate causes often overshadow the real issue: climate change, which increases the intensity and frequency of catastrophic phenomena. Tackling this crisis requires urgent action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions using already available technologies and investments to strengthen territorial resilience. Only a combination of mitigation and adaptation can prevent irreversible damage, ensuring a sustainable future for the next generations.

In the image: The Parable of the Speck and the Log. Ottmar Ellinger the Younger

Even in the face of the vast Los Angeles wildfires—still ongoing—as in other recent circumstances, the media's attention is primarily focused on the most immediate and “proximal” causes: the malfunctioning of the power grid, insufficient water reserves, the unpreparedness of newly hired firefighters, and so on.