fbpx The Big Bang gravitational echo | Science in the net

The Big Bang gravitational echo

Primary tabs

Read time: 8 mins

A real earthquake has been shacking the international scientific community over the last few days.
The Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics of Boston announced last week, with a very laconic press release, that a “major discovery” would have been presented during a press conference on Monday, March 17th. No clues, however, were given on the nature of it. This media strategy, similar to that one used by CERN for announcing the discovery of Higgs boson, has paid off: among the unavoidable rumours and outbursts of enthusiasm from one side or scepticism to the other, suspense has been quite thick for days.

At the press conference stands out John Kovac, cosmologist head of the BICEP2 experiment (Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization 2) in Antarctic: a microwave telescope that measures temperature and polarisation of the cosmic background with great accuracy. 
Kovac announces that, after three years of work, his team has detected within the cosmic background radiation the effect of the gravitational waves produced immediately after the Big Bang; besides, this effect represents a direct and unequivocal evidence of cosmic inflation. In other words: we saw the very first “wail” of the universe, the “gravitational echo” of the Big Bang, and we also demonstrated for the first time that a fundamental cosmological theory is valid.

This astonishing announcement – at least for a physicist – has been immediately reported has a sensational result: “Besides finding life on other planets or directly observing the dark matter, I cannot imagine a more important discovery in astrophysics in the short term for improving our understanding of the Universe” comments Sean Carroll, theoretical physicist of the California Institute of Technology. Someone already talk about the Nobel Prize. But what has been discovered, precisely? And why is it so important? Let’s go in order and draw an overview of situation.

CMB, INFLAtion and GRavitational waves

It all started in 1964, when the US physicists Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered, by chance, a weak radiation in the range of microwaves coming from any direction of the sky in a particularly homogeneous way and without any evident source. Later it was discovered that the source is the Universe itself: that radiation, then named “Cosmic Microwave Background” (CMB) represents the first electromagnetic imprint of our Universe. A sort of photography of the cosmos when it was “only” 380,000 years old. Before that, matter and radiation where so entangled that the Universe was completely opaque, unable to release any light.
The CMB became an incontrovertible evidence in favour of the Big Bang theory, which states that the Universe and the space-time had an origin, about 13.8 billion of years ago. However, the CMB also gave some troubles. For example: why is it so homogeneous? Why all the regions of the “child” Universe seem to have agreed for the same temperature (and then the same density)? A possible answer to this question was proposed in 1981 by Alan Guth, then researcher of Stanford University.
Guth’s idea is really simple: at a certain point the Universe started expanding faster than light, and stopped after a while. Now, we don’t need to understand why it did it; but in that period of accelerated expansion, called “inflation”, the Universe’s dimensions changed from those of a subatomic particle to those of a fruit within an infinitesimal fraction of a second. This huge “cosmic stretching” levelled everything: as if a cubic centimetre of air into a room expanded until occupying it all, making the temperature and the density uniform in the all room. According to the theory of inflation, this is more or less what happened to the Universe between 10–35 s and 10–32 s after the Big Bang.

However, despite the inflation being quite efficient, the density of the primordial universe cannot be completely uniform: Heisenberg uncertainty principle imposes the existence of unavoidable quantum fluctuations, that inflation should have amplified and “frozen” on macroscopic scale. These quantum fluctuations are visible in the CMB that in fact shows extremely small inhomogeneities of the order of one part per 100,000: as if the surface of a 10 m deep swimming pool had 0.1 mm high waves. Thanks to the slow and patient action of gravity, from those extremely small density perturbations were originated galaxies, planets, stars and, then, in a way, also us.

Now, the obvious question is: can we find traces of inflation in the CMB? The answer is: yes! And here we need to talk about the gravitational waves. Foreseen by Albert Einstein one century ago from the general relativity, gravitational waves are ripples in the space-time that propagate at light speed, compressing and dilating the space-time at their passage. The theory of inflation predicts the emission of high quantity of gravitational waves that in their cosmic journey can interact with the photons of CMB leaving their “imprint”. This track is just what has been observed from the BICEP2 team, and for this reason it represents an incontrovertible proof of inflation: “Finally – comments Giovanni Bignami, President of the National Institute of Astrophysics (INAF) – we have an idea of how the Universe got so big so quickly. Everybody always believed that the theory of inflation was the only possible solution, but to have an observational evidence, even though indirect, it’s great”.
But how is it possible to distinguish between the perturbations caused by quantum fluctuations and those due to gravitational waves? We need to observe the CMB polarisation, i.e. the oscillating direction of the electric field of the electromagnetic waves that constitute the cosmic background radiation. Polarisation perturbations caused by density fluctuations (called “scalar”) produce radial or circular polarisation patterns: “E-mode” for the physicists; perturbations caused by gravitational waves (called “tensor”) can produce E-mode or “swirly” patterns named “B-mode”.

Towards quantum gravity?

Kovac and his team observed exactly the presence of B-modes within the CMB polarisation, which can be reasonably ascribed to gravitational waves. CMB B-modes had already been observed recently by two “rival” instruments: the South Pole Telescope (SPT) in Antarctica and PolarBEAR in the Atacama Desert (Chile), but at angular scales too small for ensuring that they were caused by primordial gravitational waves and compatible on the other hand with the gravitational lensing effect of galaxy clusters. Instead, BICEP2 observations show B-modes at angular scales of about 1° (about double the apparent diameter of the full Moon), exactly as predicted by the theory of inflation.
The B-modes observed by Kovac and his team are much more intense than expected. Physicists describe the “force” of CMB polarisation by means of a parameter called r, which represents the ratio between the intensity of scalar and tensor perturbations. Before this discovery, there was a certain consensus around a value of r = 0.1. The measurements carried out by BICEP2, however, are compatible with r = 0.2: about double the intensity. Meaning – according to the physicists – that the energies involved when these gravitational waves were produced were around 2 · 1016 GeV (gigaelectronvolt). An enormous value, about one billion times higher than what can be obtained by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) of CERN, the most powerful particle accelerator in the world.
This huge level of energy, according to the most accredited physics models, corresponds to a phase of the Universe where the fundamental forces of nature (electromagnetic, strong nuclear and weak nuclear, excluding gravitational force) were unified.

Kovac and his team’s observations would therefore confirm that also gravity has a quantum nature. Max Tegmark, physicist of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, has no doubts: “This is the first experimental evidence of quantum gravity”.

Waiting for confirmations

But how solid are Kovac’s team analyses? According to the data they presented during the press conference, quite a lot: statistical significance of observed B-modes is 5,2σ, which means that the chance of being mistaking is less than one over 3,500,000. The most delicate point remains being reasonably sure that the observed effect is produced by primordial gravitational waves: this is not 100% guaranteed, but the sky zone observed by BICEP2 (named “Southern Hole” by the astronomers) is well known for being particularly “clean”, i.e. without dust or other materials that might disturb the CMB polarisation; besides, the observed polarisation characteristics are definitively different from those obtained by the interaction of CMB and cosmic dust.

According to the first responses, the data seem to be valid from a statistical point of view. Naturally, their solidity will need to be tested too, which means that they will need to be compatible with independent measurements. In other words, the discovery will be confirmed only if similar experiments will provide similar results. Marc Kamionkowski, physicist at the John Hopkins University, ensures that “It will be quite easy to rapidly assess if this is a real or fake discovery”: several research groups all over the world are in fact ready to get independent measurements.  In particular, there is a lot of expectation for the results of the satellite Planck, of the European Space Agency (ESA), launched in 2009 and able to measure very accurately the CMB polarisation. These data are at the moment under analysis and should be released by next year.

In conclusion, Kovac’s discovery awaits for the evaluation of the international scientific community. Some scientists strongly hope in this result (Alan Guth in primis) and others are already picking holes in the BICEP2 team’s papers. It might happen that the discovery was revealed incorrect: as in September 2011, when the OPERA experiment of Gran Sasso announced the discovery of superluminal neutrinos, and then it was revealed that the measurements of their speed were affected by a systematic error. But if confirmed, Kovac and his team’s discovery will play a crucial role for several reasons:

  • for the first time a signal produced after the Big Bang has been observed;
  • this result represents the first observational direct evidence of the theory of inflation;
  • it supports the idea of the unification of fundamental forces and in particular of quantum nature of gravity;
  • it opens a new door for the observation of the cosmos.


Primordial gravitational waves are a new land to discover, that can provide us with fundamental information on the very first instants of our Universe.

Filippo Bonaventura

Scienza in rete è un giornale senza pubblicità e aperto a tutti per garantire l’indipendenza dell’informazione e il diritto universale alla cittadinanza scientifica. Contribuisci a dar voce alla ricerca sostenendo Scienza in rete. In questo modo, potrai entrare a far parte della nostra comunità e condividere il nostro percorso. Clicca sul pulsante e scegli liberamente quanto donare! Anche una piccola somma è importante. Se vuoi fare una donazione ricorrente, ci consenti di programmare meglio il nostro lavoro e resti comunque libero di interromperla quando credi.

prossimo articolo

How far has scientific culture come in Italy in the last twenty years?

It will be presented on March 18 the 20th edition of the Science Technology and Society Yearbook by Observa, which gathers twenty years of data to provide an overview of the most significant dynamics and trends in the relationships between science, technology, and society. Here is our review of the report.

Often when the Italian speaker discusses any topic, they express their opinions. The Anglo-Saxon speaker, on the other hand, often starts by presenting data, and then, if really necessary, offers their opinion.