fbpx Flu scientists will resume their research | Page 10 | Science in the net

Flu scientists will resume their research

Read time: 1 min

One year ago, a group of influenza scientists decided to take a break from their experiments, in order to clearly explain the benefits of their important research and the measures taken to minimize its possible risks. This decision came after the intense debate over the publication on Nature and Science of two papers on the generation of H5N1 avian influenza viruses that are transmissible in mammals. On January 24th, Nature and Science published a joint announcement where those scientists – led by the authors of the two controversial papers, Yoshihiro Kawaoka and Ron Fouchier – announced their intention to interrupt their voluntary moratorium. This will occur in those countries whose governments and institutions have given approval and following the establishment of appropriate biosafety and biosecurity conditions. The aims of the voluntary moratorium have been met, the scientists wrote, and avian-flu researchers have a public-health responsibility to resume their research.

“…decided to take a break…”: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v481/n7382/full/481443a.html

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Dossier: 
Influenza

prossimo articolo

Why science cannot prove the existence of God

The demonstration of God's existence on scientific and mathematical grounds is a topic that, after captivating thinkers like Anselm and Gödel, reappears in the recent book by Bolloré and Bonnassies. However, the book makes a completely inadequate use of science and falls into the logical error common to all arguments in support of so-called "intelligent design."

In the image: detail from *The Creation of Adam* by Michelangelo. Credits: Wikimedia Commons. License: public domain

The demonstration of God's existence on rational grounds is a subject tackled by intellectual giants, from Anselm of Canterbury to Gödel, including Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Leibniz, and Kant. However, as is well known, these arguments are not conclusive. It is not surprising, then, that this old problem, evidently poorly posed, periodically resurfaces.