fbpx Obama e la scienza | Page 4 | Science in the net

Obama e la scienza

Primary tabs

Read time: 1 min

A margine dell'ormai storico discorso sulla liberalizzazione della ricerca sulle staminali embrionali, il presidente Obama ha presentato un memorandum volto a "ristabilire l'integrità scientifica nei processi decisionali del governo". Ha poi così continuato:

"Let’s be clear: promoting science isn’t just about providing resources – it is also about protecting free and open inquiry. It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it’s inconvenient – especially when it’s inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda – and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology...That is why today, I am also signing a Presidential Memorandum directing the head of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy to develop a strategy for restoring scientific integrity to government decision making. To ensure that in this new Administration, we base our public policies on the soundest science; that we appoint scientific advisors based on their credentials and experience, not their politics or ideology; and that we are open and honest with the American people about the science behind our decisions".

Guarda il discorso completo

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Ricerca

prossimo articolo

AI Agents as assistants in scientific research

Imaginary portrait of a human researcher and their robot assistant

Researchers work with an increasing volume of scientific literature and ever more complex methodologies, and for this reason, they can rely on new support tools: Agent Laboratory, AgentRxiv, AI Scientist-v2, and Co-Scientist are AI-based systems designed to assist them in their work.

The landscape of contemporary scientific research presents several significant challenges. On one hand, the growing specialization requires increasingly vertical expertise, while on the other, the need for interdisciplinary studies demands the ability to navigate through different domains of knowledge. This paradox puts pressure on researchers, who must balance depth and breadth in their investigations.