fbpx Milano-Bicocca keep on rising in University Ranking THE | Page 10 | Science in the net
  1. Milano-Bicocca keep on rising in Times University Ranking
  2. Revisions
  3. Milano-Bicocca keep on rising in University Ranking THE

Milano-Bicocca keep on rising in University Ranking THE

Pubblicato il 01/05/2014Read time: 6 mins

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UKSpain FranceGermanyItaly
Lancaster UniversityPompeu Fabra UniversityUniversité Paris-SudUniversität UlmMilano - Bicocca
University of WarwickAutonomous University of BarcelonaUniversité Pierre et Marie CurieUniversität KonstanzRoma III
University of EssexAutonomous University of MadridUniversité Paris Diderot – Paris 7Universität Bayreuth 
Brunel UniversityUniversity of Rovira i VirgiliUniversité Montpellier 2Universität Bielefeld 
University of BathUniversity of VigoUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1Ruhr-Universität Bochum 
Plymouth UniversityPolytechnic University of ValenciaUniversité Paris DauphineUniversität Duisburg-Essen 
Heriot-Watt UniversityPolytechnic University of Catalonia   
University of Hertfordshire    
University of Surrey    
Loughborough University    
University of Strathclyde    
University of Kent    
Aston University    
Autori: 
di amministratore
Sezioni: 
Press review
  • 6155 reads

prossimo articolo

Why science cannot prove the existence of God

di Hykel Hosni
di Angelo Vulpiani
Pubblicato il 04/10/2024

The demonstration of God's existence on scientific and mathematical grounds is a topic that, after captivating thinkers like Anselm and Gödel, reappears in the recent book by Bolloré and Bonnassies. However, the book makes a completely inadequate use of science and falls into the logical error common to all arguments in support of so-called "intelligent design."

In the image: detail from *The Creation of Adam* by Michelangelo. Credits: Wikimedia Commons. License: public domain

Social sciences

The demonstration of God's existence on rational grounds is a subject tackled by intellectual giants, from Anselm of Canterbury to Gödel, including Thomas Aquinas, Descartes, Leibniz, and Kant. However, as is well known, these arguments are not conclusive. It is not surprising, then, that this old problem, evidently poorly posed, periodically resurfaces.