Change in attitudes towards vaccination after H1N1 pandemic

Read time: 2 mins

From TELLME website

As recognized by many experts, the ongoing decline of public confidence in vaccines is one of the main challenges for public health management. A recent paper published on Eurosurveillance shows that unfavorable attitudes towards vaccination dramatically increased from 8.5% in 2000 to 38.2% in 2010 in France.

The study investigated the potential impact of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic on attitudes towards vaccination among people living in metropolitan France. It was based on data from the last three waves (2000, 2005, 2010) of the “Health Barometer”, a telephone survey on health perceptions, knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, which was targeted at the general population. The age interval of the sample was 12 to 75 years (15 to 85 years in 2010).

It is interesting to note that beyond the increase in negative attitudes observed in 2009 to 2010, half of the respondents who endorsed these attitudes spontaneously mentioned their opposition to the influenza A(H1N1) vaccine. Such a shift demonstrates that many people who accept vaccines may change their mind and that this episode may have undermined public confidence in health authorities and vaccination.

Another interesting result is that sociodemographic profile associated with unfavorable attitudes towards vaccination in general significantly changed in 2009/10: influenza A(H1N1) vaccination acceptance was correlated with high educational level, high socioeconomic status and living in a household with a child under the age of five years. This result is in contrast with some previous studies, which found that highly educated parents were prone to refuse vaccination for their children, even if these parents did not oppose vaccination in general. Such disparities may be due to the fact that people with lower education are much less likely to use information material from official authorities, as some studies demonstrated.

Articoli correlati

Aiuta Scienza in Rete a crescere. Il lavoro della redazione, soprattutto in questi momenti di emergenza, è enorme. Attualmente il giornale è interamente sostenuto dall'Editore Zadig, che non ricava alcun utile da questa attività, se non il piacere di fare giornalismo scientifico rigoroso, tempestivo e indipendente. Con il tuo contributo possiamo garantire un futuro a Scienza in Rete.

E' possibile inviare i contributi attraverso Paypal cliccando sul pulsante qui sopra. Questa forma di pagamento è garantita da Paypal.

Oppure attraverso bonifico bancario (IBAN: IT78X0311101614000000002939 intestato a Zadig srl - UBI SCPA - Agenzia di Milano, Piazzale Susa 2)

altri articoli

Pollution and Covid. Two vague clues don't make an evidence

In these days, newspapers and television programs (and the web, of course) are giving space to a statement by the Italian Society of Environmental Medicine (SIMA) announcing important discoveries on the link between airborne particulate matter and Coronavirus, even describing them as important for the decisions to be taken in the coming weeks.